EELA Updates

Court watch

2018-06-05

Pending

Case C-551/16. Free movement, Social insurance

J. Klein Schiphorst – v – Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen, reference lodged by the Dutch Centrale Raad van Beroep on 31 October 2017

European Court of Justice (ECJ), 2017-10-31

Summary

2018-06-05

Case C-551/16. Free movement, Social insurance

J. Klein Schiphorst – v – Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen, reference lodged by the Dutch Centrale Raad van Beroep on 31 October 2017

European Court of Justice (ECJ), 2017-10-31

Court watch

2018-06-05

Pending

Case C-527/16. Free movement, Social insurance

Salzburger Gebietskrankenkasse, Bundesminister für Arbeit, Soziales und Konsumentenschutz – v – Alpenrind GmbH and Others, reference lodged by the Austrian Verwaltungsgerichtshof on 14 October 2017

European Court of Justice (ECJ), 2017-10-14

Summary

2018-06-05

Case C-527/16. Free movement, Social insurance

Salzburger Gebietskrankenkasse, Bundesminister für Arbeit, Soziales und Konsumentenschutz – v – Alpenrind GmbH and Others, reference lodged by the Austrian Verwaltungsgerichtshof on 14 October 2017

European Court of Justice (ECJ), 2017-10-14

Court watch

2018-05-01

Ruling

ECJ 20 December 2017, case C-442/16 (Gusa), Free movement, Social insurance

Self-employed workers who have ceased their activity for reasons beyond their control and who are registered as jobseekers, retain their status as self-employed persons for the purposes of Article 7(1)(a) of Directive 2004/38.

European Court of Justice (ECJ), 2017-12-20

Summary

2018-05-01

ECJ 20 December 2017, case C-442/16 (Gusa), Free movement, Social insurance

Self-employed workers who have ceased their activity for reasons beyond their control and who are registered as jobseekers, retain their status as self-employed persons for the purposes of Article 7(1)(a) of Directive 2004/38.

European Court of Justice (ECJ), 2017-12-20

Court watch

2018-05-01

Ruling

ECJ 7 december 2017, case C-189/16 (Zaniewicz-Dybeck), Free movement, Social insurance

A minimum benefit as defined in Article 50 of Regulation No 1408/71 may not be calculated in accordance with Articles 46(2) and 47 of that Regulation, but benefits receive in other Member States may be taken into account in calculating the minimum benefit.

European Court of Justice (ECJ), 2017-12-07

Summary

2018-05-01

ECJ 7 december 2017, case C-189/16 (Zaniewicz-Dybeck), Free movement, Social insurance

A minimum benefit as defined in Article 50 of Regulation No 1408/71 may not be calculated in accordance with Articles 46(2) and 47 of that Regulation, but benefits receive in other Member States may be taken into account in calculating the minimum benefit.

European Court of Justice (ECJ), 2017-12-07

Court watch

2018-05-01

Ruling

ECJ 13 September 2017, case C-570/15 (X), Free movement, Social insurance

A Dutch employee who resides in Belgium and performs only 6.5% of his hours worked in Belgium (and the rest in the Netherlands), cannot be regarded as ‘normally’ pursuing an activity in two or more Member States. The special rule in Article 14(2)(b)(i) of Regulation No 1408/71, stating that a person normally employed in the territory of two or more Member States shall be subject to the legislation of the Member State in whose territory he resides, does not apply in this case.

European Court of Justice (ECJ), 2017-09-13

Summary

2018-05-01

ECJ 13 September 2017, case C-570/15 (X), Free movement, Social insurance

A Dutch employee who resides in Belgium and performs only 6.5% of his hours worked in Belgium (and the rest in the Netherlands), cannot be regarded as ‘normally’ pursuing an activity in two or more Member States. The special rule in Article 14(2)(b)(i) of Regulation No 1408/71, stating that a person normally employed in the territory of two or more Member States shall be subject to the legislation of the Member State in whose territory he resides, does not apply in this case.

European Court of Justice (ECJ), 2017-09-13