ECJ 9 November 2017, case C-98/15 (Espadas Recio), Part-time work

While a provision that treats the unemployment benefits of vertical part-time workers unfavourably compared to full-time workers falls outside the scope of the Framework Agreement on part-time work, such a benefit scheme may still violate the principle of equal treatment of men and women, for example, if it is indirectly discriminatory towards women.

ECJ 9 November 2017, case C-98/15 (Espadas Recio), Part-time work

While a provision that treats the unemployment benefits of vertical part-time workers unfavourably compared to full-time workers falls outside the scope of the Framework Agreement on part-time work, such a benefit scheme may still violate the principle of equal treatment of men and women, for example, if it is indirectly discriminatory towards women.

ECJ 13 July 2017, case C-354/16 (Kleinsteuber), Part-time work and sex discrimination

Distinctions made for part-time workers in calculating occupational pension can be acceptable, as long as the calculations are based on legitimate objectives in accordance with law.

ECJ 13 July 2017, case C-354/16 (Kleinsteuber), Part-time work and sex discrimination

Distinctions made for part-time workers in calculating occupational pension can be acceptable, as long as the calculations are based on legitimate objectives in accordance with law.

Case C-653/16. Discrimination

Does the Czech legislation under which judges are not entitled to remuneration for on-call duty,...

Case C-653/16. Discrimination

Does the Czech legislation under which judges are not entitled to remuneration for on-call duty,...

Case C-354/16. Part-time work and sex discrimination

1(a). Is the relevant EU law, in particular Clause 4(1) and (2) of the Framework Agreement on...

Case C-354/16. Part-time work and sex discrimination

1(a). Is the relevant EU law, in particular Clause 4(1) and (2) of the Framework Agreement on...

2015/45 Parental part-time employment: no entitlement to lump sum overtime compensation (AT)

According to the Austrian Maternity Protection Act and the Paternity Leave Act, employees working part-time are not, in principle, entitled to lump sum overtime compensation. If such employees do work overtime, they are entitled to overtime compensation in accordance with applicable laws and regulations

<p><strong>2015/45 Parental part-time employment: no entitlement to lump sum overtime compensation (AT)</strong></p>

According to the Austrian Maternity Protection Act and the Paternity Leave Act, employees working part-time are not, in principle, entitled to lump sum overtime compensation. If such employees do work overtime, they are entitled to overtime compensation in accordance with applicable laws and regulations