ECJ 22 April 2020, Case C-692/19 (Yodel Delivery Network), Working time, Employment status

B - v - Yodel Delivery Network Ltd, UK case

ECJ 22 April 2020, Case C-692/19 (Yodel Delivery Network), Working time, Employment status

B - v - Yodel Delivery Network Ltd, UK case

2020/8 Right of temporary workers to the same pay for the same work (LT)

Temporary workers – v – UAB Manpower Lit and the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE)

2020/9 Employment Tribunal finds that 'workers' transfer under TUPE (UK)

Dewhurst and others – v – (1) Revisecatch Ltd t/a Ecourier; (2) City Sprint (UK) Ltd

2020/8 Right of temporary workers to the same pay for the same work (LT)

Temporary workers – v – UAB Manpower Lit and the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE)

2020/9 Employment Tribunal finds that 'workers' transfer under TUPE (UK)

Dewhurst and others – v – (1) Revisecatch Ltd t/a Ecourier; (2) City Sprint (UK) Ltd

2020/10 No acquisition of leave entitlement during sabbatical (GE)

Parties Unknown

2020/10 No acquisition of leave entitlement during sabbatical (GE)

Parties Unknown

EELC Law Review 2019: Disability and gender discrimination

2020/4 Admissibility of Employers’ Requirements regarding Religious Symbols in Workplace (GE)

Many national decisions in Germany in the past had to deal with employers’ requirements regarding religious symbols in the workplace. Also, in 2017, the ECJ has dealt with two matters of such. Whilst the ECJ strictly refers to the principles of entrepreneurial freedom, the Federal Labour Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht, the ‘BAG’) tends to give priority to religious freedom. Last year, the BAG appealed to the ECJ for final clarification, in particular regarding the relationship between the basic rights of entrepreneurs and the constitutional right to religious freedom, by way of a preliminary ruling procedure with its decision dated 30 January 2019.