Top of page ↑

Summary

European Court of Justice (ECJ), February 7, 2019

ECJ 7 February 2019, case C-322/17 (Bogatu), social insurance

Eugen Bogatu – v – Minister for Social Protection, Irish case

Question

Must Regulation No 883/2004 and, in particular, Article 67, read in conjunction with Article 11(2) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation such as that in the main proceedings, in order to be eligible to receive family benefits in the competent Member State, it is necessary for a person to pursue an activity as an employed person in that Member State or to be in receipt of cash benefits from that Member State because or as a consequence of such activity?

Ruling

Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems and, in particular, Article 67, read in conjunction with Article 11(2) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation such as that in the main proceedings, in order to be eligible to receive family benefits in the competent Member State, it is not necessary for a person either to pursue an activity as an employed person in that Member State or to be in receipt of cash benefits from that Member State because or as a consequence of such activity.