ECJ 5 May 2022, case C-405/20 (BVAEB), Gender Discrimination, Pension

EB, JS, DP - v - Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB), Austrian case

ECJ 24 February 2022, case C-389/20 (TGSS (domestic worker unemployment)), Gender Discrimination, Social Insurance

CJ – v – Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS), Spanish case

ECJ 24 February 2022, case C-389/20 (TGSS (domestic worker unemployment)), Gender Discrimination, Social Insurance

CJ – v – Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS), Spanish case

2021/37 Employer loses discrimination claim after trying to reduce gender pay gap (UK)

An Employment Tribunal (ET) decision involving an advertising agency has highlighted the dangers for employers of taking an overly aggressive approach to reducing gender pay gaps. It also provides a reminder that all discrimination is unlawful, even where the victims are from a historically privileged group.

2021/37 Employer loses discrimination claim after trying to reduce gender pay gap (UK)

An Employment Tribunal (ET) decision involving an advertising agency has highlighted the dangers for employers of taking an overly aggressive approach to reducing gender pay gaps. It also provides a reminder that all discrimination is unlawful, even where the victims are from a historically privileged group.

ECJ 3 June 2021, case C-624/19 (Tesco Stores), Gender Discrimination, Discrimination General

[Employees] – v – Tesco Stores Ltd, UK case

ECJ 3 June 2021, case C-624/19 (Tesco Stores), Gender Discrimination, Discrimination General

[Employees] – v – Tesco Stores Ltd, UK case

ECJ 12 May 2021, Case C-130/20 (INSS (Complément de pension pour les mères – II)), Gender Discrimination, Pension

YJ – v – Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), Spanish case

ECJ 12 May 2021, Case C-130/20 (INSS (Complément de pension pour les mères – II)), Gender Discrimination, Pension

YJ – v – Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), Spanish case

ECJ 21 January 2021, C-843/19 (INSS), Gender Discrimination, Pension

Requiring a minimum pension amount for allowing early retirement is not contrary to Article 4(1) of Directive 79/7 even if it puts female workers at a particular disadvantage, provided that this is justified by legitimate reasons of social policy which are not related to gender discrimination.